MCAD Research Bank

CASES

Palacios v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 132 Or. App. 243 (1995). 

MATERIALS

1.   Palacios v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Petitionerís Brief (1. Does the Boardís Order increasing the prison term an additional 120 months violate case law that prohibits harsher sentences after a case is remanded by the appellate courts? 2. Did the Boardís order violate ex post facto guarantees by using a recent amendment to OAR 255-40-025 limiting time reductions for meritorious prison conduct? 3. Did the Boardís order further violate the ex-post-facto guarantees by failing to set the prison term within the matrix range once they over-rode the judicially imposed minimum sentence?) Sally Avera and Lawrence J. Hall, attorneys for Petitioner, 03/93.

2.   Palacios v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Petitionerís Supplemental Brief.

3.   Palacios v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Respondentís Brief. Theodore R. Kulongoski, Virginia Linder, Harrison Latto attorneys for Respondent.

4.   Palacios v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Supplemental Respondentís Brief.

5.   Palacios v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Petition for Review of PetitioneróAppellant, Appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeals on an appeal from a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.

6.   Palacios v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, Pro Se Supplemental Petition for Review of Petitioner Appellant, 05/95.